1. The Fundamental Truths of Law

We are going to explore three truths:

1. The True Rules of Law, Justice and Due Process have never changed;
2. There has been no proper society under the Rule of Law for more than 400 years;
3. Ucadia is the only viable path to restoring the True Rule of Law and just societies.

The Ultimate Truth of Reality

Life (Universe) is a Dream of Unique Collective Awareness, according to certain Rules.

The oldest civilizations on the planet and all our ancestors knew that life is a dream according to rules. They also knew that the Universe is amoral; meaning it is neither good nor evil; however, the Universe will react in favor of free will and resist tyranny – being the removal of free will.

Life is a Dream and it is the mind that is reality and the body and world that you feel is concrete is all an illusion. A healthy mental construct is a mind that is completely open on all channels, implying a lower mind, properly connected to its higher mind and divine mind, whilst linking through the conscious- emotion-neural centers of the body, otherwise known as the Chakra points for a full immersive experience of the dream of life. This exemplifies one of the deepest of insights, namely that the meaning of ALL is literally Awareness Loves Life.

An analogy on how to perceive the difference between lower mind, higher mind and divine mind. Think of lower mind as the unique you. Now, think of higher mind as you representing your combined families and clans, being all your ancestors – like some giant wedding, christening and birthday all rolled into one. Then, think of divine mind of you representing the species of Homo Sapiens as one. That is the difference.

Why is this important? the elite that run this present illusionary world know it is a lie and think anyone that swallows their lies is a complete idiot and a sheep for slaughter or enslavement – it is in the fact that the English language in the 17th Century introduced over one thousand words ending with the Latin word “ment” for mind, as a complete control apparatus of the mind – words such as Government, Parliament, Employment, Enslavement, Entertainment, Enforcement and on and on its goes – Over one thousand words that are critical to controlling the world as a slave planet. The Western-Roman model world is all about “shutting down” our higher cognitive-memory-emotional centers and senses and replacing our lower senses with false stimulation and constructs so we become busy and distracted “shells” of our potential.

Their Model has been progressively designed and refined over the centuries to the present day, so there is literally “no way out”. Even if you break through all the prison walls to the end, but still cling to the notion that the Bible is true and that the history created by the elite Pisan/Venetian/Dutch families was written for the good of humanity and not to perpetuate their own power, then such absolutely gullible and mindlessly stupid thinking keeps you within the Western-Roman Prison.

The Tripartite Nature of our Existence

We are spiritual beings, each possessing a unique mind, expressed in flesh and are immortal. You can never die. One way of viewing all these components is the Tripartite Nature of your existence-of body, mind and spirit. When you come to the law, and you look at the structures of law you need to keep this model in mind as it keeps repeating in such structures. The concept that we are three components, the body, mind and spirit, re-occur in language, in terms, in form, and in ritual throughout law and throughout the history of law. Remember this perspective of the tripartite nature of our existence of body, mind and spirit moving forward.

The Tripartite Relations of Life

The relation of “three” is to be found in many relations of life, here are three examples of that:

1. The tripartite view of time, of the past, the present and the future.
2. The tripartite view of events and actions, being the reason, the intention and the purpose of an action or the motive in law, and the cause of an action due to the reason.
3. The tripartite view of the action itself, the action relating to the cause and the reason-the three parts. The source of relation, beginning with the source, leading to an object, and from there we have a derivative, a copy of the original object.

The Duality Nature of our Existence

Another way of viewing the nature of our existence is the concept of Duality. We have spoken of Tripartite, of three, and now let’s look at the Duality view of existence in terms of Reality vs. Fiction, of the Dream vs. the Dreamer, and of the Inner World vs. Outer World. If we take a human being as an example, we have a male or female individual within reality as the internal perception of ourselves and then outside of the individual boundary is the fiction, the fictional concept such as a piece of paper or a name where we create a person or a “strawman version” of ourselves. It is very important to make the distinction between the two as they are separate.

The Duality Relations of Life

We can see the application of duality again in the duality relations of life. There is the concept of Property, which is an example of duality being a fictional concept called a “right of use”. For example, a home as the reality, a physical home. But you cannot hold your home. As much as we claim to “possess” our homes we cannot put our arms around our homes. Thus, we have the fictional home. The fictional home is a “right of use” that may then be proven in a Certificate of Title, in entitlement as the “right of use.” This is a classic example of the application of the duality nature of our existence between the “real” and the “fiction.”

What is Law?

A rule, standard rule, or norm permitting or prohibiting certain actions, derived by divine instruction of a wise council of elders, a discovery of science, custom or consent in the form of a vote, election or plebiscite.

Another way of viewing the Law is that “All are equal under the Law, the Golden Rule of Law.”   

We also see a rule by divine instruction, by tradition, is regarded the highest of all laws. A rule by scientific discovery, by general tradition or custom, is the second highest view. Edict by council represents the people as another level of law. A plebiscite, or vote is the fourth level of law. In a democracy, the Law of the people is regarded as the highest form of Law.

What is a Right?

The word, “Right” is used constantly in politics, in news, in protests, in law in

Court, so what in essence is a “Right?”

A “Right” is an ecclesiastical, moral or legal capacity, a privilege, a liberty, a faculty or power and associated obligations, remedy, relief and exceptions held in Trust.

There are Divine Rights and Natural Rights, Superior Rights and Inferior Rights. Thus, there are certain aspects of Rights. There are Rights that we might regard as Natural Rights and Rights in Reality. Then there are Rights that relate to the fiction.

In the Duality model, using a home as an example, under Reality we may “possess” the home under the right Ius Possessionis, and we may use the home as our domicile through the Ius Usus, the Right of Use.

Under the Duality model of Law there may well be and there usually are parallel Rights beyond simply possession, such as:

• Ius Possidendi, the Right of Dominion ownership, separated from the Right of Possession.
• Ius In Re Propria are the Rights of fruits of enjoyment as the owner
• Ius Proprietatis that is the Right of Property Ownership.

By ignoring Rights in Duality in practice, and forgetting that duality occurs in law frequently and constantly when talking about property and Rights, we may feel that we “own” a property by virtue of possessing it. In reality we may only be the “occupier” and we may only possess a lower Right and someone else possesses a much, much higher Right than us. They actually own a property on a record in a register and we are merely the tenants.

What are some key Rights?

What are some of the key rights that are bestowed to all men and women by the Divine

Creator? Here are ten key Rights as an example.

1. Ius Naturale Vitam that is the Natural Right to Life.
2. Ius Naturale Vivus, the Natural Right to Possession and Ownership of one’s own body.
3. Ius Naturale Proprius is the Natural Right to one’s own character, identity and name.
4. Ius Naturale Nutrimens is the Natural Right to food and sustenance.
5. Ius Naturale Tectum is the Natural Right to shelter.
6. Ius Naturale Salutis is the Natural Right to safety and well-being.
7. Ius Naturale Connubii is the Natural Right of Union; we don’t need a “license” to marry. A license implies seeking legal permission to commit an illegal act.
8. Ius Naturale Usus is the Natural Right of Use.
9. Ius Naturale Usarae is the Natural Right to the Fruits and Enjoyment of Use. This is what usury used to mean. It was the Natural Rights to the Fruits and Enjoyment of Use, such as income, produce, before they made it an immoral and illegal act and convinced us that usury was bad.
10. Ius Naturale Fructibus that is the Natural Rights to the fruits, the energy, the results of one’s own work. It’s the fruits of your own work; it is the usury of your own work and your own “sweat equity.”

These are an example of ten fundamental rights that are bestowed to all men and women by the Divine Creator. There are many more rights defined in the Ucadia materials for those interested in further study.

The Law is necessarily fictional

The Law is necessarily fictional. The reason that the Law is necessarily fictional is that when the Law seeks to prohibit or permit certain actions in order to prove that something has been breached or in order to enforce something it has to be re-created, there has to be a re-presentation of the alleged events of reality. The Law is effectively about the “drama” that is the re-creation of events of the characters, the stages of drama.

Take the Tripartite Model of Reason, Cause and of Action:

1. There is the Form, of which there are two:
   • Lex Loci, the law of the place that claims authority over the matter
   • Lex Fori, the law of the forum claiming the authority to hear and judge the matter.
2. There is the Cause:
   • The immediate cause, as the suit or action pending
   • The one accused.
3. There is the Action, of which there are two:
   • Actio in Personum, the Action against the Person, and a violation of one or more Rights
   • Actio in Rem, the Action of Thing in the recovery of some contested Right or Property.

The legal world of Form is Fiction:

The legal world of Form accepts that Law is necessarily Fiction. The legal world converts the physical world into Persons or Things. What this means is that the physical world has such names as the different forms of objects and concepts where something is described as an object, a being, or a species, or an animal, or plant.

In order to function, the legal world converts all of those into one of either being “Persons” or “Things.”:

1. Person is in personam.
2. Things are described as Re or in re or in rem.      

A point to highlight is that for several hundred years Roman Courts have been falsely converting Natural Persons into Things. That is denying logic, reason and justice. Some people even volunteer to declare themselves as “things” when they accept being called Pro Se. Pro Se is short for Pro Se in Rem, or a declaration in the court to the effect that I am a thing. One should never, ever accept or declare Pro Se.

What is Person?

A Person is a fictional Form enclosing attributes such as:

1. The Identity of a Man/Woman
2. A Body Politic, Assembly, or a Thing.

The best way to view the different aspects of Person is to remember as is built in English, the concept of the First Person, the Second Person and the Third Person:

1. First Person, also known as the Natural Person, described as the Propria Persona as in the Office of Man or the Office of Woman. (Pronouns: I, Thou, Me, My, Mine, Myself, We, Us, Our and Ourselves)
2. Second Person, also known as the Artificial Person or Sui Juris, in One’s Own Right, or Agentis Iuris (or Ius Agens) as an Agent of the Principal (Pronouns: You, Ye, Yours, Yourself, and Yourselves)
3. Third Person is predominantly the “Thing.” A legal person or a statutory or surrogate
   person as in Alieni Iuris, that means “under the control of another as a ward, a lunatic, or an
   infant.” Or it can be Pro Se that is short for Pro Se In Rem that means I am a thing.
   (Pronouns: he, she, it, they, them, their, theirs, and themselves)

It is very important to get a handle on the levels of person so as not to get tricked into agreeing to being a person, and we know exactly where we sit and stand in their system.

What is a Thing?

This is a very important concept to comprehend. A thing is described as:

A temporary Form under the complete control of the court where its status or ownership is disputed.

Another way of describing what is going on with a thing is where there is some contestable dispute regarding a Property, or a form of Property or Right. Where there is some contest, something that would otherwise be described as an object of being a species, an animal, a plant, a man, or a house will be converted either into a Thing or, it won’t be converted into a Thing, within the complete control of the courts. The right the court claims is Ius in Rem, the Right in Rem.

When thinking about Things in their system and in the law system:

1. Things have no Mind or Soul; therefore, they have no Will.
2. A Thing that comes to court on summons, and virtually all summonses are in Rem, as it is a secret letter or demand.
3. If a Thing comes to such a court without an Agent, then it can be assumed that the Thing is to be a “wreck”, part of a “wreck”, or “lost at sea” and “abandoned cargo.” It can be bailed as property in surety for the debt that has just been agreed to without objection. In other words, the Thing can be put into a warehouse, known otherwise as a prison, if some other surety cannot be found.

These are incredibly important, fundamental concepts that need to be appreciated before getting into the complexities of law.

The Hierarchy of Law

By tradition:

1. Divine Law is the highest law followed by
2. Natural Law and then
3. Positive Law – the laws of Men and Women under Natural Law. Things such as Admiralty Law, Maritime Law, Administrative Law, Contract Law, and International Law, are all forms of Positive Law and the lowest forms of Law.

All Law is first Auricular (heard, spoken)

From the beginning of civilization all law was spoken to be law.

In a system that is so automated as the present day, in order to maintain the appearance of law, even though there is no true Rule of Law and has been no true Rule of Law for more than four hundred years, and in order to maintain the appearance of law, this fact cannot be avoided. All law is first auricular and writing is and has always been the memorialization of an event and not the other way around.

For example, laws begin as Bills that are then read into Hansard. Monarchs and Leaders pronounce Laws into existence. Officials are vested into office after speaking an oath. Defendants attend and present their defensive hearings. Court cases are founded on the Sacrament of Confession. All are based on auricular, spoken information and evidence. In the memorialization, proceedings and events are recorded into the record. The intention and conveyance between two parties is memorialized into a deed.

The Golden Rule of Law

The concept of The Golden Rule of Law makes clear the difference between what is Law and what is not Law. The principle of the Golden Rule of Law has been so emaciated, removed, hidden, and disrespected, it is easy to fall back into the details and not remember this as the cornerstone of everything. The Golden Rule is:

 “All are equal under the same Law, no one is above the law.”

If the Golden Rule exists, the people, the bankers, judges, and the politicians, would all be subject to the same law. There would be no presumptions of superiority to the Law. There would be no disrespect of the Law by one who is assuming to be “higher than another.” All people of the same community are then subject to the same Rule of Law if the Golden Rule of Law exists. All are bound to live by the laws of the community if the Golden Rule of Law exists. No one may be accused or seek relief except by law under the Rule of Law. No one may be punished except by Law under the Rule of Law.

What Law is Not

Knowing what the Golden Rule is, it is easy to be absolutely and unmistakably emphatic as to what the Law is not. Where there is no Rule of Law, where there is no equality, there is no Law!

Here are some irrefutable facts:

1. A rule that is secret cannot be a Law. It is an absurdity to conceive a rule being secret as a law.
2. A rule that is unclear in meaning cannot be a Law, for a rule that cannot be applied cannot be a Law.
3. Where there is no justice there is no Law.
4. Where there is no Honor of Rule of Law, there is no Law.

Why is this important? It is important as we exist at present in a world where the vast majority of people believe that Law, Rule of Law exists, because the apparatus is in place to create the illusion and perception of Law. Once we know what the Law is, and once we know what the Law depends upon as its fundamentals, then we are more able to easily expose the false perceptions and the false claims of the existence of Rule of Law.

What is Justice?

Justice is the application of the Rule of Law to Rights through Due Process by Officers possessing Clean Hands, Good Trust and Impartiality. It is absolutely necessary that when any matter is brought forward in matters of Law there must be:

1. Clean Hands, meaning that there is no “agenda” and one cannot profit from one’s own wrong.
2. There is Bona Fide that means “good trust”. Bona Fide means good trust and not good faith.
3. There is Impartiality and Objectivity which means that there is no prejudice. If in a court of law, the parties moving (the cause) have an interest in it, that means that they are profiting from their own fraud and their own wrong. When they are breaching the rules of trust, trustees and fiduciary, when they are not taking proper oaths and vows, when they are lying and giving false testimony, and where a judge or magistrate is being prejudicial in the matter, then there is no justice.

We need to see what the fundamentals are before moving onto remedy and possible solutions. By exposing the breaches of trust, exposing the prejudice, exposing the fraud and the corruption we can start to find relief and remedy.  

What is Not Justice

 The maxims of justice are:

1. All are equal under the Law
2. All are accountable and answerable under the Law.
3. All have the right to a fair trial
4. All have the right to know the accusations and the proof against them
5. The burden of proof lies upon him who accuses and not he who denies.
6. All are without blemish, and all are innocent until proven culpable.

Knowing these principles is important in order to see the false presumptions made against us.

What is Due Process?

Ancient Traditions, Procedures and Maxims of Justice.

1. All are equal under the law
2. All are accountable and answerable under the law
3. All have a right to a fair trial
4. All have the right to know the accusations and proof against them
5. The burden of proof lies upon him who accuses, not he who denies
6. All are without blemish (innocent) until proven culpable
7. An action in law cannot proceed without first examining a cause
8. An action in law cannot arise from fraud, bad faith or prejudice
9. No man be a judge in his own matter
10. No one may suffer punishment for mere intent or transgressions of another

All law fell under these premises for thousands of years until the Bankers took over 200 years ago and set up the summary justice system of today.

The Rule of Relation

The Rule of Relation occurs because logic would presume that no one could conceive that an object or a concept be created that is greater than its creator. We live in a system now that has been so broken for so long, that in the absence of proper teaching of Logic and Reason, there are corporations that are in fact operating as if they are greater than their creator. This is an absurdity, an absolute abomination of Law and a delusion and thus automatically without any rights and certainly if raised in the proper manner with absolutely no recourse to continue in such a fashion.

The logical concept is that a company formed from an Estate cannot have more power than the Estate that created it. Certainly, the estate can have no more power, or greater power, than the Trust from where the Rights are derived. Today we have the absurd notion where companies are claiming greater powers than the Estates that created the companies and the Estates are creating greater powers than the Trusts that created the Estates. Another absurdity facing us, in a broken system, is that Logic provides to us as an answer and a form of remedy just in knowing the absurdity and that is the Rule of Sequence.

The Rule of Sequence

The Rule of Sequence states that an object or a concept created cannot exist before the object or concept that created it. You cannot be born before your Mother, or your Father! It’s an absurdity, an irrationality, a delusion that exposes the one who makes such an assertion incapable of presenting a defense or certainly incapable of presenting an accusation. It renders it immediately null and void if presented in the proper manner.

Using the example of a Person then a Law and then a crime. A Person exists, a Law is made, a crime may be committed and one may be punished for that crime. One cannot have a crime committed before the Person exists to create the crime. One cannot argue that an action is criminal after the fact, in retrospect. That is an absurdity and yet in many parts of the world for over the last hundred years, claimed laws on the books were invented by retrospective legislation. This is an absolute abomination and absurdity in Law.

Law, Reason and Action

A valid Law is always applied to an alleged Action and its Reason. We see the concept again of Reason to Action and Cause is in the center. In the past, in the form of Law, the Reason is the Mens Rea, which means guilty mind, and Action is the Actus Reus, that means the guilty act.

Why we don’t see the proof of Reason as Mens Rea of guilty mind in modern courts any more is that model only applies to in personam. If one is describing in rem and one is describing a Thing, then Reason is irrelevant. Only the Action needs to be proven because a Thing is assumed to have no mind and that is how they get away with that.

What is an Action, In Law?

In ancient Roman Law, there was the Testimony, the Accusatio, and then the request for some form of Relief, the Praecipe, and then the form, the Ius Vocare, where the Accusation was formerly spoken into a court, a Tribunal.

Under the Carolingian Law from the 9th to the 11th centuries, there was the Testimony being memorialized in the Memorandum and then the Request, that is the Petition, and then the Form is the Original Writ.

The English Law before Summary Justice was invented in the 1840s and the entire system was bastardized by converting everyone into a Thing, it began with the Affidavit, that then led to the Complaint and then the Bill being issued.

There has been no Western society under the Rule of Law for more than 400 years

There has been no Law, no Rule of Law of any Western society for more than four hundred years. In truth what we have been dealing with are the various layers of tyranny, piracy and organized crime. The best way to prove that is in two forms:

1. Let the sheer number of Laws speak for themselves
2. To look at the deliberate cognitive dissonance between the official presentation of certain key concepts such as Rule of Law and the occult knowledge that is exposed to those that are members of their fraternities and then finally the real truth in law that even those in their own fraternities are deprived of knowing. The first people that the system lies to are the lawyers.

History of Law – From beginning to 1540

We can reasonably state that only 500,000 Laws were promulgated since the beginning of civilization to 1540; that’s half a million laws; whereby, 90% were variations of the same basic laws. Details can be found with further study. An example, when one looks at such history as the Code of Hammurabi, the Law of Hammurabi, and other forms of law over history, it can be found that the same basic principles appear over and over again; thus, saying that the vast majority of Law up until the time of 1540 was variations of the same thing.

History of Law – From 1540 to 1798

Looking from 1540 to 1793 we can find that 500,000 Laws were created in that space of time. While it might have taken thousands of years to reach the figure of half a million, in less

than 300 years, 500,000 laws were created, predominantly through England, with less than 40% of them having any reference to true historic law. What was going on?We are starting to see that  concepts, such as privilege, where Rights were being restricted and where there were limits on capacity and the growth of revenues and duties as well as the birth of annuities and other forms of possession in favor of ownership rather than the actual possession.

History of Law – From 1799 to 1920

Looking at this history of Law from 1799 to 1920, there was an astounding change, where there were more than 10,000,000 Laws created in less than 200 years from 1799 to 1920 with less than 20% of them having any true resemblance to the true historic law.

What was goingon? 1799 to 1920 saw the complete destruction of any notions of equality of rights or Rule of Law with millions of laws that granted privileges, immunities and powers that were particularly focused on the introduction of the notion of faculty. Faculty was a privilege or a special power granted to a person to do or refrain from doing something that would otherwise be made illegal. Matrimony was made illegal. The Natural Right of choosing a mate, a union, was made illegal. That is what a marriage license is for, to an exception for something that would otherwise be illegal. The concept of living in a shelter was made illegal. You could not live without a Settlement Certificate if you were poor. To prove that they completely eliminated any notion of the Rule of Law, the proposed laws that were put forward into a Parliament were no longer Statutes or Petitions; they became Bills, both in a commercial sense and a Bill in the form of obtaining an exemption, an exception, a privilege, a liberty. Bills grant privileges, ownership, rights and alienate Rights of the general population for the benefit of a few. That is exactly what Bills do and that is why they call them Bills. The truth is in plain sight.

History of Law – From 1945 to present

From 1945 to the present, it gets worse. Since 1945 to the present, over 100 million laws have been created across the planet with less than one percent of those having any resemblance to history. That is why we can say effectively that from 1801 there is absolutely no Rule of Law. Anyone that says to you that there is Rule of Law is lying or is ignorant. There hasn’t been any Justice in English countries since the 1840s. Why? Because under the Summary Justice Acts beginning in the 1840s, all are considered guilty until proven innocent.

Why is there not greater clarity amongst those that may be attorneys or may go to law school or may be involved in some form of law? Why is there such a dissonance in the Truth Movements?

The Truth of Rule of Law

  There has been no proper Rule of Law for more than 400 years:

• Official Public Claim: Society exists under proper rule of law (what the public is told)

“Modern democratic societies exist under proper Rule of Law whereby every citizen is considered equal and subject to the same set of laws, where rights are protected and upheld and the courts follow due process.”

• Secret Occult Belief: The Law is whatever we say it is, and we can change it.

(what the Fraternities teach their own members, the inside knowledge to give them the edge, where knowledge is power and where they are granted immunities and privileges, as well as make millions and live as they wish, if they don’t deviate from the rules of the fraternity)

“The reality is that society is still class-based; whereby, an elite govern the masses and may change the laws at any-time, to suit themselves. Rights can be squashed and exemptions and immunities granted and business goes on, so long as the masses believe there is some notion of rule of law.”

• Truth in Law: No Golden Rule of Law, no true justice, there is no law.

“Any society that enslaves its people, or considers slavery a moral right (e.g. US 13^th amendment), or grants immunities to an elite few, or makes its own people enemies and criminals, or judges make people guilty before innocent (as in all British commonwealth and former colonies) has no law or legitimacy and is simply a tyrannical system under force, fear and terror.”

The Truth of Modern Public Law

The “Public Law” of modern nations is actually Corporate By-Laws of a Private Company

• Official Public Claim: Statutory & Common Law

“The Law of the People is Public and formed through Statutes passed by Legislature or precedents established through the courts or customary maxims (Common Law) applied over centuries.”

• Secret Occult Belief: Codes & Procedures

“Public Law is largely ignored and instead Executive Regulations and Codes (eg. UCC) and Policies & Procedures are what determine the outcome of law in practice.” (What we see when we are dealing with lawyers, barristers, attorneys, judges and others that are familiar in the practice of modern law)

• The Truth in Law: Corporate By-Laws

“Public institutions and Government are now controlled by private corporate bodies. Executive Regulations are dictates and nor law. Codes & Procedures are nothing more than Corporate By-Laws.” (Here we have the state and the truth of modern law. The “Public Law” of modern nations is    actually Corporate By-Law of a Private Company).

Here the inside knowledge for attorneys and lawyers, that Public Law is largely ignored and instead executive regulations and codes, policies and procedures like the US Codes is what determines the outcome of Law in practice. Forget about quoting statutes, common law, and the Constitution. What runs the courts are the codes and procedures such as the US Codes; however, the Truth in Law that even the lawyers are deprived of is the reality that it is all corporate bylaws. Public institutions and government are controlled by private, corporate bodies and executive regulations are dictated and not law. Codes and procedures are nothing more than corporate bylaws. The reason that the US Codes blatantly deviate from hundreds of statutes, of hundreds of laws passed by US Congress, and the reason that the US Codes do not resemble the Public Law of United States is that it is a corporate set of bylaws, and nothing more, of the corporation known as the United States Inc.

The Truth of Modern Judges

1. Official Public Claim: Publicly Appointed Officer of Law

“A judge or justice is a public officer, appointed by legislative or executive authority, to administer the law in a public court of record and justice.”

2. Secret Occult Belief: Privately Empowered Agent

“A judge is a privately empowered (licensed) agent or a contractor acting as a surrogate justice (judge) employed to arbitrate matters for the “state” and other clients brought into his/her place of business.”

3. Truth in Law: Registrar of Ecclesiastical & Admiralty Causes

“Since the late 19^th Century, a judge is no longer a justice permitted to determine points of law, but merely a registrar of ecclesiastical & admiralty causes, empowered to enter into the public record based on procedures and policies only. In other words, they ceased to have any right as a judge.”

This gives an insight to what a judge knows and what a magistrate may know, what you think you know and what is the Truth. Again, this shows the cognitive dissonance that you face when you go to a court room. This is the Truth of modern judges. We are told that a judge or a justice is a public officer appointed by legislative or executive authority to administer the law in a public court of record and justice. That is the standard, stock, official definition of a judge. The reality is that the inside knowledge that the judges have that makes them feel arrogant towards you, self-confident towards you and wary of you if you start to ask pointed questions, is that they believe that a judge is a privately empowered or licensed agent or contractor acting as a surrogate and these are key words, a surrogate justice. A surrogate justice is a judge employed to arbitrate matters for the State and other clients brought into his or her place of business, that is why he or she has a plaque that is designating his or her place of business. That is how a judge thinks, how a judge is trained and that is the inside occult knowledge that judges have.

The truth that only a few judges fully appreciate and know, such as the presiding judges, the chief justices. The Truth in Law is that a judge is nothing more than a registrar of ecclesiastical & admiralty causes. Since the late 19th century, the judge is no longer a justice permitted to determine points of law. That is illegal and that is why they have to have a license. They are merely registrars of ecclesiastical and admiralty causes.  empowered to enter into the Public Record based on procedures and policies only. In other words, they ceased to have any right to judge. A judge is not permitted to judge. Their license gives them the ability to ask questions only to the extent to clarify the facts before them. That is the limit of their power. Now you know more than most judges know.

Here are the statutes that brought this into existence, that were the foundation of the Supreme Courts of Judicature Procedures Acts that begin in the late 19th Century, for further research. See: 38&39Vict_ c77, 40&41Vict_c9, 42&43Vict_c78, 44&45Vict_c68

These can be found online on UK Parliament Statutes websites.

The Truth of the Legal Adversarial System

Guilt and Debt is already decided within the fabric of the Legal System

1. Official Public Claim: Substance of evidence and argument usually wins

“In either the adversarial or inquisition systems of law, the truth of the case is proven upon the strength of the evidence and merits of the arguments by either the accuser/investigator or the one being accused.”

2. Secret Occult Belief: Method & Style of argument are more important

“Knowledge of special forms, special procedures and exception are more important to winning than merely the substance of the evidence and argument. The Socratic Method may be used to play “hot potato” and place the liability with the one left having to answer, usually the defendant.” (What attorneys, solicitors, barristers and legal practitioners are introduced to is that method and style of argument is more important than substance.)

3. Truth in Law: Guilt is already assumed under summary justice

“Since the 19^th Century, under the Summary Justice model, guilt is already assumed the moment an accusation is raised. A Summons is a form of letter of demand if not objected to, then proves the liability for the debt (penal sum) of the case. The tricks of attorneys and lawyers is merely for show, or a back-up if there is genuinely an error or false accusation.”

This the cognitive difference between every single solicitor, attorney, and barrister that you will face. There is self-confidence, a cockiness and self-assuredness of these attorneys and legal practitioners that you will face. There is a reason for that. This is one of the key reasons. They believe they know more than you do, particularly on this point that is the Truth of the Legal Adversarial System.

This is why you find, certainly in paper and in any kind of legal proceeding this, never-ending move towards motions to strike and special forms and all kinds of attempts to obstruct, obviate, and delay. All of these are kind of tricks of the trade that attorneys and solicitors and barristers believe that they have. They are trained to believe that method and style of argument is more

important. Probably the greatest example of that is what is called the Socratic Method. It is a lie of history; Socrates was never a lawyer. He would never have argued the way that lawyers argue. It should actually be called the Monty Python Method after the dead parrot play where a man comes to claim his parrot is dead and John Cleese claims the parrot is still alive. It is

basically a “he-said, she-said argument.”

That is really what the Socratic Method is. It is what attorneys and lawyers believe and that is they can play “hot potato” and place the liability on the one left having to answer, usually the defendant. This is what you see in endless letters with attorneys who make a claim, you deny the claim, they make the claim again, and you deny it again, they make the claim again and if you do responses with attorneys without using affidavits and proper form you will find that they just never stop. They honestly believe that through the Socratic Method, the “hot potato”, or the “pass the parcel”, that so long as the liability ends with the opponent, they have one. It is the same in court. The truth that exposes that all the self-confidence of attorneys, solicitors and barristers is completely ill-founded, is that Guilt is already assumed under Summary Justice.

The Truth of Modern Police Powers

Police are employed to raise revenue, protect the rich and only then protect the people

1. Official Public Claim: Police Officers protect and enforce the law

“Police Officers are public law officials, given special powers to protect the community and uphold   the law. Their actions are lawful when supported by proper instruments such as licenses, warrants, summons and other valid orders, normally issued by a court of law.”

2. Secret Occult Belief: Police Officers are agents needing cause or contract

“A law enforcement officer is a privately empowered (licensed) agent or contractor acting as a surrogate, employed to uphold and protect the law, but only insured where there exists (1) warrant, or (2) probable cause, or (3) an implied contract (adhesion contract) or actual contract of consent.”

3. Truth in Law: Police Officers are privateers and bounty hunters

“Since the 19^th Century, under various anti-slavery treaties between Britain, US and countries/dependencies, police officers are privateers and bounty hunters searching for enemy combatants, lost or abandoned cargo. Runaway slaves and assumed criminals. Their function is to (1) make money, (2) protect the banks and elite families and (3) protect the community if it does not conflict with (1) and. (2).”

Police are employed to raise revenue, protect the rich and only then protect the people. That is the fact from the very first police departments being formed in London and ever sinc then. Google and see 29Geo2 c25, 31Geo2 c17, 32Geo3 c53, 42Geo3 c76, 48Geo3 c140, 10Geo4 c44, 3&4Will4 c19, 3&4Will4 c46, 6&7Will4 c29, 2&3Vict c47 and 2&3Vict c71 as examples for further research.

The State of Law Today

The point is to show why you are encountering the cognitive dissonance in this second part when you try to speak to the third box as to the Truth in Law. When you jump from the public view and bypass the occult view that is a lie, and then try to speak to the truth that attorneys, barristers, solicitors and judges and people who live their daily lives in Law cannot hear you. They don’t know the Law! They don’t know the Truth! They are absolutely confident that they know something that you don’t know because that is how they are trained. They are being lied to and their whole world is a lie. They have no knowledge of the truth. That is exactly how the system divides and conquers. It keeps every element separate.

It can be frustrating when faced with the constant inertia of friction of cognitive dissonance when starting to become more competent in the fundamentals of Law.

A New Model is the Only Viable Path

A new model is needed as a viable path to restoring the True Rule of Law. In the Ucadia Model, the Covenant of One Heaven, in Article 25 the full components to Ucadia are given. To date there is no other model that is more complete, more comprehensive, than the Ucadia Model. Other models can be developed as long as they follow the Golden Rule and the fundamentals of True Law, Due Process and Justice.